Practice problems for computing DP. Answers at bottom of page. This is all made-up data.
1.
Has Disease |
Does not have Disease |
|
| Symptom present | 10 |
10 |
| Symptom not present | 0 |
20 |
What is the contingency between the symptom (predictor) and the disease (outcome)? Is the symptom a positive indicator of the disease?
2.
Economy improves |
Economy does not improve |
|
| Increase taxes | 15 |
85 |
| Leave taxes same | 50 |
30 |
What is the contingency between increasing taxes (predictor) and improving the economy (outcome)? If true, should we increase taxes?
3.
Got a job within 6 months of graduating |
Did not get a job within 6 months of graduating |
|
| Majored in engineering | 160 |
40 |
| Did not major in engineering | 400 |
1600 |
What is the contingency between one's major (predictor) and getting a job (outcome)? Should one major in engineering?
4.
Lost weight |
Did not lose weight |
|
| Exercised 3 times per week | 8 |
2 |
| Did not | 100 |
900 |
What is the contingency between exercise (predictor) and losing weight (outcome)? Should you exercise?
5.
Gets the flu this year |
Does not get the flu this year |
|
| Gets at least 7 hours of sleep | 16 |
64 |
| Does not get at least 7 hours | 30 |
30 |
What is the contingency between being well rested (predictor) and getting the flu (outcome)? Should you sleep more in order to avoid contracting the flu?
Answers
1. DP = .50; yes, it is an imperfect positive indicator that the patient might have the disease.
2. DP = -.475; no, you should not increase taxes in order to improve the economy.
3. DP = .60; yep, engineering majors are in a good position for getting a job.
4. DP = .70; unfortunately, yes we should.
5. DP = -.30; yes, sleeping more will reduce the likelihood of getting the flu.